0.07/0.13 % Problem : theBenchmark.p : TPTP v0.0.0. Released v0.0.0. 0.07/0.13 % Command : run_vampire %s %d THM 0.13/0.34 % Computer : n026.cluster.edu 0.13/0.34 % Model : x86_64 x86_64 0.13/0.34 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz 0.13/0.34 % Memory : 8042.1875MB 0.13/0.34 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64 0.13/0.34 % CPULimit : 1920 0.13/0.34 % WCLimit : 240 0.13/0.34 % DateTime : Wed Jul 30 02:14:34 EDT 2025 0.13/0.34 % CPUTime : 0.13/0.36 This is a THF_ problem 0.13/0.36 Running higher-order theorem proving 0.13/0.37 Running /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/vampire-hol --cores 7 --input_syntax tptp --proof tptp --output_axiom_names on --print_def_sorts on --mode portfolio --schedule snake_tptp_hol /export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.x7nx6qmTR1/E---3.1_30349.p -m 16384 -t 240 0.13/0.40 % (30544)dis+1010_1:1_au=on:cbe=off:chr=on:fsr=off:hfsq=on:nm=64:sos=theory:sp=weighted_frequency:i=27:si=on:rtra=on_0 on E---3.1_30349 for (2399ds/27Mi) 0.13/0.40 % (30545)lrs+10_1:1_au=on:inj=on:i=2:si=on:rtra=on_0 on E---3.1_30349 for (2399ds/2Mi) 0.13/0.40 % (30546)lrs+1002_1:128_aac=none:au=on:cnfonf=lazy_not_gen_be_off:sos=all:i=2:si=on:rtra=on_0 on E---3.1_30349 for (2399ds/2Mi) 0.13/0.40 % (30542)lrs+1002_1:8_bd=off:fd=off:hud=10:tnu=1:i=183:si=on:rtra=on_0 on E---3.1_30349 for (2399ds/183Mi) 0.13/0.40 % (30547)lrs+1002_1:1_au=on:bd=off:e2e=on:sd=2:sos=on:ss=axioms:i=275:si=on:rtra=on_0 on E---3.1_30349 for (2399ds/275Mi) 0.13/0.40 % (30545)Instruction limit reached! 0.13/0.40 % (30545)------------------------------ 0.13/0.40 % (30545)Version: Vampire 4.8 (commit 7b44b1c2f on 2025-07-15 09:50:17 +0100) 0.13/0.40 % (30545)Termination reason: Unknown 0.13/0.40 % (30545)Termination phase: Property scanning 0.13/0.40 % (30546)Instruction limit reached! 0.13/0.40 % (30546)------------------------------ 0.13/0.40 % (30546)Version: Vampire 4.8 (commit 7b44b1c2f on 2025-07-15 09:50:17 +0100) 0.13/0.40 0.13/0.40 % (30545)Memory used [KB]: 1023 0.13/0.40 % (30545)Time elapsed: 0.004 s 0.13/0.40 % (30545)Instructions burned: 3 (million) 0.13/0.40 % (30545)------------------------------ 0.13/0.40 % (30545)------------------------------ 0.13/0.40 % (30546)Termination reason: Unknown 0.13/0.40 % (30546)Termination phase: Property scanning 0.13/0.40 0.13/0.40 % (30546)Memory used [KB]: 1023 0.13/0.40 % (30546)Time elapsed: 0.004 s 0.13/0.40 % (30546)Instructions burned: 3 (million) 0.13/0.40 % (30546)------------------------------ 0.13/0.40 % (30546)------------------------------ 0.13/0.40 % (30542)First to succeed. 0.13/0.40 % (30548)lrs+1004_1:128_cond=on:e2e=on:sp=weighted_frequency:i=18:si=on:rtra=on_0 on E---3.1_30349 for (2399ds/18Mi) 0.13/0.40 % (30544)Also succeeded, but the first one will report. 0.13/0.40 % (30547)Also succeeded, but the first one will report. 0.13/0.40 % (30542)Refutation found. Thanks to Tanya! 0.13/0.40 % SZS status Theorem for E---3.1_30349 0.13/0.40 % SZS output start Proof for E---3.1_30349 0.13/0.40 thf(func_def_0, type, in: $i > ($i > $o) > $o). 0.13/0.40 thf(func_def_2, type, is_a: $i > ($i > $o) > $o). 0.13/0.40 thf(func_def_3, type, emptyset: $i > $o). 0.13/0.40 thf(func_def_4, type, unord_pair: $i > $i > $i > $o). 0.13/0.40 thf(func_def_5, type, singleton: $i > $i > $o). 0.13/0.40 thf(func_def_6, type, union: ($i > $o) > ($i > $o) > $i > $o). 0.13/0.40 thf(func_def_7, type, excl_union: ($i > $o) > ($i > $o) > $i > $o). 0.13/0.40 thf(func_def_8, type, intersection: ($i > $o) > ($i > $o) > $i > $o). 0.13/0.40 thf(func_def_9, type, setminus: ($i > $o) > ($i > $o) > $i > $o). 0.13/0.40 thf(func_def_10, type, complement: ($i > $o) > $i > $o). 0.13/0.40 thf(func_def_11, type, disjoint: ($i > $o) > ($i > $o) > $o). 0.13/0.40 thf(func_def_12, type, subset: ($i > $o) > ($i > $o) > $o). 0.13/0.40 thf(func_def_13, type, meets: ($i > $o) > ($i > $o) > $o). 0.13/0.40 thf(func_def_14, type, misses: ($i > $o) > ($i > $o) > $o). 0.13/0.40 thf(func_def_15, type, fun_image: ($i > $i) > ($i > $o) > $i > $o). 0.13/0.40 thf(func_def_16, type, fun_composition: ($i > $i) > ($i > $i) > $i > $i). 0.13/0.40 thf(func_def_17, type, fun_inv_image: ($i > $i) > ($i > $o) > $i > $o). 0.13/0.40 thf(func_def_18, type, fun_injective: ($i > $i) > $o). 0.13/0.40 thf(func_def_19, type, fun_surjective: ($i > $i) > $o). 0.13/0.40 thf(func_def_20, type, fun_bijective: ($i > $i) > $o). 0.13/0.40 thf(func_def_21, type, fun_decreasing: ($i > $i) > ($i > $i > $o) > $o). 0.13/0.40 thf(func_def_22, type, fun_increasing: ($i > $i) > ($i > $i > $o) > $o). 0.13/0.40 thf(func_def_37, type, sK0: $i > $o). 0.13/0.40 thf(func_def_38, type, sK1: $i > $o). 0.13/0.40 thf(func_def_39, type, sK2: $i > $i). 0.13/0.40 thf(f142,plain,( 0.13/0.40 $false), 0.13/0.40 inference(avatar_sat_refutation,[status(thm)],[f125,f133,f141])). 0.13/0.40 thf(f141,plain,( 0.13/0.40 ~spl3_1), 0.13/0.40 inference(avatar_contradiction_clause,[status(thm)],[f140])). 0.13/0.40 thf(f140,plain,( 0.13/0.40 $false | ~spl3_1), 0.13/0.40 inference(subsumption_resolution,[status(thm)],[f136,f109])). 0.13/0.40 thf(f109,plain,( 0.13/0.40 (sK4 = (sK2 @ sK5))), 0.13/0.40 inference(equality_proxy_clausification,[status(thm)],[f105])). 0.13/0.40 thf(f105,plain,( 0.13/0.40 (((sK2 @ sK5) = sK4) = $true)), 0.13/0.40 inference(binary_proxy_clausification,[status(thm)],[f104])). 0.13/0.40 thf(f104,plain,( 0.13/0.40 ($true = (((sK1 @ sK5) & (sK0 @ sK5)) & ((sK2 @ sK5) = sK4)))), 0.13/0.40 inference(beta_eta_normalization,[status(thm)],[f103])). 0.13/0.40 thf(f103,plain,( 0.13/0.40 ($true = ((^[Y0 : $i]: (((sK1 @ Y0) & (sK0 @ Y0)) & ((sK2 @ Y0) = sK4))) @ sK5))), 0.13/0.40 inference(sigma_clausification,[status(thm)],[f102])). 0.13/0.40 thf(f102,plain,( 0.13/0.40 ((?? @ $i @ (^[Y0 : $i]: (((sK1 @ Y0) & (sK0 @ Y0)) & ((sK2 @ Y0) = sK4)))) = $true)), 0.13/0.40 inference(binary_proxy_clausification,[status(thm)],[f100])). 0.13/0.40 thf(f100,plain,( 0.13/0.40 (((?? @ $i @ (^[Y0 : $i]: (((sK1 @ Y0) & (sK0 @ Y0)) & ((sK2 @ Y0) = sK4)))) => ((?? @ $i @ (^[Y0 : $i]: ((sK1 @ Y0) & ((sK2 @ Y0) = sK4)))) & (?? @ $i @ (^[Y0 : $i]: ((sK0 @ Y0) & ((sK2 @ Y0) = sK4)))))) = $false)), 0.13/0.40 inference(beta_eta_normalization,[status(thm)],[f99])). 0.13/0.40 thf(f99,plain,( 0.13/0.40 (((^[Y0 : $i]: ((?? @ $i @ (^[Y1 : $i]: (((sK1 @ Y1) & (sK0 @ Y1)) & ((sK2 @ Y1) = Y0)))) => ((?? @ $i @ (^[Y1 : $i]: ((sK1 @ Y1) & ((sK2 @ Y1) = Y0)))) & (?? @ $i @ (^[Y1 : $i]: ((sK0 @ Y1) & ((sK2 @ Y1) = Y0))))))) @ sK4) = $false)), 0.13/0.40 inference(sigma_clausification,[status(thm)],[f98])). 0.13/0.40 thf(f98,plain,( 0.13/0.40 ((!! @ $i @ (^[Y0 : $i]: ((?? @ $i @ (^[Y1 : $i]: (((sK1 @ Y1) & (sK0 @ Y1)) & ((sK2 @ Y1) = Y0)))) => ((?? @ $i @ (^[Y1 : $i]: ((sK1 @ Y1) & ((sK2 @ Y1) = Y0)))) & (?? @ $i @ (^[Y1 : $i]: ((sK0 @ Y1) & ((sK2 @ Y1) = Y0)))))))) != $true)), 0.13/0.40 inference(beta_eta_normalization,[status(thm)],[f97])). 0.13/0.40 thf(f97,plain,( 0.13/0.40 (((^[Y0 : $i > $o]: ((^[Y1 : $i > $o]: (!! @ $i @ (^[Y2 : $i]: ((Y0 @ Y2) => (Y1 @ Y2))))))) @ ((^[Y0 : $i > $i]: ((^[Y1 : $i > $o]: ((^[Y2 : $i]: (?? @ $i @ (^[Y3 : $i]: ((Y1 @ Y3) & ((Y0 @ Y3) = Y2))))))))) @ sK2 @ ((^[Y0 : $i > $o]: ((^[Y1 : $i > $o]: ((^[Y2 : $i]: ((Y0 @ Y2) & (Y1 @ Y2))))))) @ sK1 @ sK0)) @ ((^[Y0 : $i > $o]: ((^[Y1 : $i > $o]: ((^[Y2 : $i]: ((Y0 @ Y2) & (Y1 @ Y2))))))) @ ((^[Y0 : $i > $i]: ((^[Y1 : $i > $o]: ((^[Y2 : $i]: (?? @ $i @ (^[Y3 : $i]: ((Y1 @ Y3) & ((Y0 @ Y3) = Y2))))))))) @ sK2 @ sK1) @ ((^[Y0 : $i > $i]: ((^[Y1 : $i > $o]: ((^[Y2 : $i]: (?? @ $i @ (^[Y3 : $i]: ((Y1 @ Y3) & ((Y0 @ Y3) = Y2))))))))) @ sK2 @ sK0))) != $true)), 0.13/0.40 inference(definition_unfolding,[status(thm)],[f86,f90,f76,f83,f83,f76,f76])). 0.13/0.40 thf(f83,plain,( 0.13/0.40 (intersection = (^[Y0 : $i > $o]: ((^[Y1 : $i > $o]: ((^[Y2 : $i]: ((Y0 @ Y2) & (Y1 @ Y2))))))))), 0.13/0.40 inference(cnf_transformation,[status(thm)],[f62])). 0.13/0.40 thf(f62,plain,( 0.13/0.40 (intersection = (^[Y0 : $i > $o]: ((^[Y1 : $i > $o]: ((^[Y2 : $i]: ((Y0 @ Y2) & (Y1 @ Y2))))))))), 0.13/0.40 inference(fool_elimination,[status(thm)],[f61])). 0.13/0.40 thf(f61,plain,( 0.13/0.40 ((^[X0 : $i > $o, X1 : $i > $o, X2 : $i] : ((X1 @ X2) & (X0 @ X2))) = intersection)), 0.13/0.40 inference(rectify,[status(thm)],[f8])). 0.13/0.40 thf(f8,axiom,( 0.13/0.40 ((^[X0 : $i > $o, X2 : $i > $o, X3 : $i] : ((X2 @ X3) & (X0 @ X3))) = intersection)), 0.13/0.40 file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.x7nx6qmTR1/E---3.1_30349.p',intersection)). 0.13/0.40 thf(f76,plain,( 0.13/0.40 (fun_image = (^[Y0 : $i > $i]: ((^[Y1 : $i > $o]: ((^[Y2 : $i]: (?? @ $i @ (^[Y3 : $i]: ((Y1 @ Y3) & ((Y0 @ Y3) = Y2))))))))))), 0.13/0.40 inference(cnf_transformation,[status(thm)],[f44])). 0.13/0.40 thf(f44,plain,( 0.13/0.40 (fun_image = (^[Y0 : $i > $i]: ((^[Y1 : $i > $o]: ((^[Y2 : $i]: (?? @ $i @ (^[Y3 : $i]: ((Y1 @ Y3) & ((Y0 @ Y3) = Y2))))))))))), 0.13/0.40 inference(fool_elimination,[status(thm)],[f43])). 0.13/0.40 thf(f43,plain,( 0.13/0.40 (fun_image = (^[X0 : $i > $i, X1 : $i > $o, X2 : $i] : (? [X3 : $i] : (((X0 @ X3) = X2) & (X1 @ X3)))))), 0.13/0.40 inference(rectify,[status(thm)],[f15])). 0.13/0.40 thf(f15,axiom,( 0.13/0.40 (fun_image = (^[X4 : $i > $i, X5 : $i > $o, X2 : $i] : (? [X0 : $i] : (((X4 @ X0) = X2) & (X5 @ X0)))))), 0.13/0.40 file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.x7nx6qmTR1/E---3.1_30349.p',fun_image)). 0.13/0.40 thf(f90,plain,( 0.13/0.40 (subset = (^[Y0 : $i > $o]: ((^[Y1 : $i > $o]: (!! @ $i @ (^[Y2 : $i]: ((Y0 @ Y2) => (Y1 @ Y2))))))))), 0.13/0.40 inference(cnf_transformation,[status(thm)],[f64])). 0.13/0.40 thf(f64,plain,( 0.13/0.40 (subset = (^[Y0 : $i > $o]: ((^[Y1 : $i > $o]: (!! @ $i @ (^[Y2 : $i]: ((Y0 @ Y2) => (Y1 @ Y2))))))))), 0.13/0.40 inference(fool_elimination,[status(thm)],[f63])). 0.13/0.40 thf(f63,plain,( 0.13/0.40 (subset = (^[X0 : $i > $o, X1 : $i > $o] : (! [X2 : $i] : ((X0 @ X2) => (X1 @ X2)))))), 0.13/0.40 inference(rectify,[status(thm)],[f12])). 0.13/0.40 thf(f12,axiom,( 0.13/0.40 (subset = (^[X0 : $i > $o, X2 : $i > $o] : (! [X3 : $i] : ((X0 @ X3) => (X2 @ X3)))))), 0.13/0.40 file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.x7nx6qmTR1/E---3.1_30349.p',subset)). 0.13/0.40 thf(f86,plain,( 0.13/0.40 ((subset @ (fun_image @ sK2 @ (intersection @ sK1 @ sK0)) @ (intersection @ (fun_image @ sK2 @ sK1) @ (fun_image @ sK2 @ sK0))) != $true)), 0.13/0.40 inference(cnf_transformation,[status(thm)],[f71])). 0.13/0.40 thf(f71,plain,( 0.13/0.40 ((subset @ (fun_image @ sK2 @ (intersection @ sK1 @ sK0)) @ (intersection @ (fun_image @ sK2 @ sK1) @ (fun_image @ sK2 @ sK0))) != $true)), 0.13/0.40 inference(skolemisation,[status(esa),new_symbols(skolem,[sK0,sK1,sK2])],[f69,f70])). 0.13/0.40 thf(f70,plain,( 0.13/0.40 ? [X0 : $i > $o,X1 : $i > $o,X2 : $i > $i] : ((subset @ (fun_image @ X2 @ (intersection @ X1 @ X0)) @ (intersection @ (fun_image @ X2 @ X1) @ (fun_image @ X2 @ X0))) != $true) => ((subset @ (fun_image @ sK2 @ (intersection @ sK1 @ sK0)) @ (intersection @ (fun_image @ sK2 @ sK1) @ (fun_image @ sK2 @ sK0))) != $true)), 0.13/0.40 introduced(definition,[],[choice_axiom])). 0.13/0.40 thf(f69,plain,( 0.13/0.40 ? [X0 : $i > $o,X1 : $i > $o,X2 : $i > $i] : ((subset @ (fun_image @ X2 @ (intersection @ X1 @ X0)) @ (intersection @ (fun_image @ X2 @ X1) @ (fun_image @ X2 @ X0))) != $true)), 0.13/0.40 inference(ennf_transformation,[status(thm)],[f54])). 0.13/0.40 thf(f54,plain,( 0.13/0.40 ~! [X0 : $i > $o,X1 : $i > $o,X2 : $i > $i] : ((subset @ (fun_image @ X2 @ (intersection @ X1 @ X0)) @ (intersection @ (fun_image @ X2 @ X1) @ (fun_image @ X2 @ X0))) = $true)), 0.13/0.40 inference(fool_elimination,[status(thm)],[f53])). 0.13/0.40 thf(f53,plain,( 0.13/0.40 ~! [X0 : $i > $o,X1 : $i > $o,X2 : $i > $i] : (subset @ (fun_image @ X2 @ (intersection @ X1 @ X0)) @ (intersection @ (fun_image @ X2 @ X1) @ (fun_image @ X2 @ X0)))), 0.13/0.40 inference(rectify,[status(thm)],[f24])). 0.13/0.40 thf(f24,negated_conjecture,( 0.13/0.40 ~! [X2 : $i > $o,X0 : $i > $o,X4 : $i > $i] : (subset @ (fun_image @ X4 @ (intersection @ X0 @ X2)) @ (intersection @ (fun_image @ X4 @ X0) @ (fun_image @ X4 @ X2)))), 0.13/0.40 inference(negated_conjecture,[status(cth)],[f23])). 0.13/0.40 thf(f23,conjecture,( 0.13/0.40 ! [X2 : $i > $o,X0 : $i > $o,X4 : $i > $i] : (subset @ (fun_image @ X4 @ (intersection @ X0 @ X2)) @ (intersection @ (fun_image @ X4 @ X0) @ (fun_image @ X4 @ X2)))), 0.13/0.40 file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.x7nx6qmTR1/E---3.1_30349.p',thm)). 0.13/0.40 thf(f136,plain,( 0.13/0.40 (sK4 != (sK2 @ sK5)) | ~spl3_1), 0.13/0.40 inference(trivial_inequality_removal,[status(thm)],[f135])). 0.13/0.40 thf(f135,plain,( 0.13/0.40 (sK4 != (sK2 @ sK5)) | ($false = $true) | ~spl3_1), 0.13/0.40 inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[f107,f121])). 0.13/0.40 thf(f121,plain,( 0.13/0.40 ( ! [X2 : $i] : (((sK0 @ X2) = $false) | (sK4 != (sK2 @ X2))) ) | ~spl3_1), 0.13/0.40 inference(avatar_component_clause,[status(thm)],[f120])). 0.13/0.40 thf(f120,definition,( 0.13/0.40 spl3_1 <=> ! [X2 : $i] : (((sK0 @ X2) = $false) | (sK4 != (sK2 @ X2)))), 0.13/0.40 introduced(definition,[new_symbols(naming,[spl3_1])],[avatar_definition])). 0.13/0.40 thf(f107,plain,( 0.13/0.40 ((sK0 @ sK5) = $true)), 0.13/0.40 inference(binary_proxy_clausification,[status(thm)],[f106])). 0.13/0.40 thf(f106,plain,( 0.13/0.40 ($true = ((sK1 @ sK5) & (sK0 @ sK5)))), 0.13/0.40 inference(binary_proxy_clausification,[status(thm)],[f104])). 0.13/0.40 thf(f133,plain,( 0.13/0.40 ~spl3_2), 0.13/0.40 inference(avatar_contradiction_clause,[status(thm)],[f132])). 0.13/0.40 thf(f132,plain,( 0.13/0.40 $false | ~spl3_2), 0.13/0.40 inference(subsumption_resolution,[status(thm)],[f128,f109])). 0.13/0.40 thf(f128,plain,( 0.13/0.40 (sK4 != (sK2 @ sK5)) | ~spl3_2), 0.13/0.40 inference(trivial_inequality_removal,[status(thm)],[f127])). 0.13/0.40 thf(f127,plain,( 0.13/0.40 (sK4 != (sK2 @ sK5)) | ($false = $true) | ~spl3_2), 0.13/0.40 inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[f124,f108])). 0.13/0.40 thf(f108,plain,( 0.13/0.40 ((sK1 @ sK5) = $true)), 0.13/0.40 inference(binary_proxy_clausification,[status(thm)],[f106])). 0.13/0.40 thf(f124,plain,( 0.13/0.40 ( ! [X1 : $i] : (((sK1 @ X1) = $false) | ((sK2 @ X1) != sK4)) ) | ~spl3_2), 0.13/0.40 inference(avatar_component_clause,[status(thm)],[f123])). 0.13/0.40 thf(f123,definition,( 0.13/0.40 spl3_2 <=> ! [X1 : $i] : (((sK2 @ X1) != sK4) | ((sK1 @ X1) = $false))), 0.13/0.40 introduced(definition,[new_symbols(naming,[spl3_2])],[avatar_definition])). 0.13/0.40 thf(f125,plain,( 0.13/0.40 spl3_1 | spl3_2), 0.13/0.40 inference(avatar_split_clause,[status(thm)],[f118,f123,f120])). 0.13/0.40 thf(f118,plain,( 0.13/0.40 ( ! [X2 : $i,X1 : $i] : (((sK2 @ X1) != sK4) | ((sK0 @ X2) = $false) | (sK4 != (sK2 @ X2)) | ((sK1 @ X1) = $false)) )), 0.13/0.40 inference(equality_proxy_clausification,[status(thm)],[f117])). 0.13/0.40 thf(f117,plain,( 0.13/0.40 ( ! [X2 : $i,X1 : $i] : (((sK0 @ X2) = $false) | ((sK1 @ X1) = $false) | ((sK2 @ X1) != sK4) | (((sK2 @ X2) = sK4) = $false)) )), 0.13/0.40 inference(binary_proxy_clausification,[status(thm)],[f116])). 0.13/0.40 thf(f116,plain,( 0.13/0.40 ( ! [X2 : $i,X1 : $i] : (((sK2 @ X1) != sK4) | ((sK1 @ X1) = $false) | (((sK0 @ X2) & ((sK2 @ X2) = sK4)) = $false)) )), 0.13/0.40 inference(equality_proxy_clausification,[status(thm)],[f115])). 0.13/0.40 thf(f115,plain,( 0.13/0.40 ( ! [X2 : $i,X1 : $i] : (((sK1 @ X1) = $false) | (((sK2 @ X1) = sK4) = $false) | (((sK0 @ X2) & ((sK2 @ X2) = sK4)) = $false)) )), 0.13/0.40 inference(beta_eta_normalization,[status(thm)],[f114])). 0.13/0.40 thf(f114,plain,( 0.13/0.40 ( ! [X2 : $i,X1 : $i] : (((sK1 @ X1) = $false) | (((^[Y0 : $i]: ((sK0 @ Y0) & ((sK2 @ Y0) = sK4))) @ X2) = $false) | (((sK2 @ X1) = sK4) = $false)) )), 0.13/0.40 inference(pi_clausification,[status(thm)],[f113])). 0.13/0.40 thf(f113,plain,( 0.13/0.40 ( ! [X1 : $i] : (($false = (?? @ $i @ (^[Y0 : $i]: ((sK0 @ Y0) & ((sK2 @ Y0) = sK4))))) | ((sK1 @ X1) = $false) | (((sK2 @ X1) = sK4) = $false)) )), 0.13/0.40 inference(binary_proxy_clausification,[status(thm)],[f112])). 0.13/0.40 thf(f112,plain,( 0.13/0.40 ( ! [X1 : $i] : ((((sK1 @ X1) & ((sK2 @ X1) = sK4)) = $false) | ($false = (?? @ $i @ (^[Y0 : $i]: ((sK0 @ Y0) & ((sK2 @ Y0) = sK4)))))) )), 0.13/0.40 inference(beta_eta_normalization,[status(thm)],[f111])). 0.13/0.40 thf(f111,plain,( 0.13/0.40 ( ! [X1 : $i] : ((((^[Y0 : $i]: ((sK1 @ Y0) & ((sK2 @ Y0) = sK4))) @ X1) = $false) | ($false = (?? @ $i @ (^[Y0 : $i]: ((sK0 @ Y0) & ((sK2 @ Y0) = sK4)))))) )), 0.13/0.40 inference(pi_clausification,[status(thm)],[f110])). 0.13/0.40 thf(f110,plain,( 0.13/0.40 ($false = (?? @ $i @ (^[Y0 : $i]: ((sK1 @ Y0) & ((sK2 @ Y0) = sK4))))) | ($false = (?? @ $i @ (^[Y0 : $i]: ((sK0 @ Y0) & ((sK2 @ Y0) = sK4)))))), 0.13/0.40 inference(binary_proxy_clausification,[status(thm)],[f101])). 0.13/0.40 thf(f101,plain,( 0.13/0.40 (((?? @ $i @ (^[Y0 : $i]: ((sK1 @ Y0) & ((sK2 @ Y0) = sK4)))) & (?? @ $i @ (^[Y0 : $i]: ((sK0 @ Y0) & ((sK2 @ Y0) = sK4))))) = $false)), 0.13/0.40 inference(binary_proxy_clausification,[status(thm)],[f100])). 0.13/0.40 % SZS output end Proof for E---3.1_30349 0.13/0.40 % (30542)------------------------------ 0.13/0.40 % (30542)Version: Vampire 4.8 (commit 7b44b1c2f on 2025-07-15 09:50:17 +0100) 0.13/0.40 % (30542)Termination reason: Refutation 0.13/0.40 0.13/0.40 % (30542)Memory used [KB]: 5628 0.13/0.40 % (30542)Time elapsed: 0.009 s 0.13/0.40 % (30542)Instructions burned: 7 (million) 0.13/0.40 % (30542)------------------------------ 0.13/0.40 % (30542)------------------------------ 0.13/0.40 % (30539)Success in time 0.016 s 0.29/0.41 EOF